Skip to main content

Related Studies

Displaying 1 - 10 of 184
2092
Quinby, L., D. & Wettstein, G. (2019). Do pension cuts for current employees increase separation? Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
  • Topic Area: Older Workers

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Compensation and Workplace Conditions Wages and Benefits Employer provided retirement benefits

828

Brown, J. R., Kapteyn, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2016). Framing and claiming: How information-framing affects expected social security claiming behavior. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 139-162.

  • Topic Area: Behavioral Finance: Retirement

  • Topic Area: Behavioral Insights

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Federal retirement benefits Behavioral interventions

396

Choi, J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. (2011). $100 bills on the sidewalk: Suboptimal investment in 401(K) plans. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 748-763.

  • Topic Area: Behavioral Finance: Retirement

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Employer provided retirement benefits

1131

Goda, G. S., Shoven, J. B., & Slavov, S. N. (2007). A tax on work for the elderly: Medicare as a secondary payer. (NBER Working Paper No. 13383). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Topic Area: Older Workers

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Federal retirement benefits Older workers' programs

1176

Benítez-Silva, H., & Yin, N. (2009). An empirical study of the effects of Social Security reforms on benefit claiming behavior and receipt using public-use administrative microdata. Social Security Bulletin, 69(3), 77-95.

  • Topic Area: Older Workers

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Federal retirement benefits Older workers' programs

354

Zivolich, S., Shueman, S.A., & Weiner, J.S. (1997). An exploratory cost-benefit analysis of natural support strategies in the employment of people with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 8, 211–221.

  • Topic Area: Disability Employment Policy

Study Type: Descriptive Analysis

Outcome Effectiveness:

Disability insurance Supplemental security income (SSI) Supported employment or other employment supports

394

Choi, J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. (2005). Are empowerment and education enough? Underdiversification in 401(k) plans. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2005, (2), 151-213.

  • Topic Area: Behavioral Finance: Retirement

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Employer provided retirement benefits

267

State of Connecticut (2009). Benefit Offset Pilot Demonstration: Connecticut final report.

  • Topic Area: Disability Employment Policy

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Disability insurance Supplemental security income (SSI)

2260
Croake, S., Mann, D., Anad, P., Geyer, J., Jones, C., Gubits, D., Morrison, K., Bell, S., Orfield, C., McGuirk, A., Stapleton, D., Rose, T., Hoffman, D., & Wittenburg, D. (2017). BOND implementation and evaluation: 2017 stage 1 interim process, participation, and impact report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, and Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research
  • Topic Area: Disability Employment Policy

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Compensation and Workplace Conditions Wages and Benefits Supplemental security income (SSI)

2332
Geyer, J., Gubits, D., Bell, S., Morrill, T., Hoffman, D., Croake, S., Morrison, K., Judkins, D., & Stapelton, D., (2018). BOND implementation and evaluation: 2017 stage 2 interim process, participation, and impact report. Abt Associates. [Benefit offset plus WIC versus Control]
  • Topic Area: Disability Employment Policy

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Effectiveness:

Compensation and Workplace Conditions Wages and Benefits Disability insurance