Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 168
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of North Carolina’s 2013 unemployment insurance reform on public benefits receipt, employment, and earnings and wages. The authors investigated similar…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of unemployment insurance reforms in seven states on employment, earnings, and wages. The authors investigated similar research questions for two other…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact a newly implemented Individual Placement and Support (IPS) program had on employment and earnings outcomes of homeless veterans who were diagnosed with a psychiatric or…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Homeless Veteran Dental Program on employment outcomes of homeless veterans. The authors used VA administrative data to compare the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the effect of group-based, work-related cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) on work-related outcomes of unemployed, homeless people diagnosed with social anxiety…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the effect of the Veterans Homelessness Prevention Demonstration (VHPD) program on the employment, earnings, public benefit receipt, and education and training outcomes of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a counseling intervention – Making Employment Needs (MEN) Count – on employment. The study compared employment for adults who received the MEN…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of California's Paid Family Leave Program on employment.The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes of California firms and similar…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of school-to-work (STW) programs on unemployment. The study used a nonexperimental design with data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of America's Promise on employment and earnings outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes of individuals who…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
