Skip to main content
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Reemployment Services and Eligibility Assessments (RESEA) Library

To help practitioners find high-quality research to support RESEA program development and improvement, CLEAR has catalogued RESEA studies and assigned evidence ratings to indicate RESEA intervention effectiveness.

Here you can find which interventions have received high or moderate ratings, based on findings from rigorous causal impact studies. You can also delve into summaries of individual studies of interventions that you are interested in, to learn details such as the design of those interventions, the contexts where interventions were studied, the outcomes that were examined, and the sizes of impacts that were found. Those details can help you apply evidence to decisions regarding your own programs.

Latest Findings

Adding subsequent RESEA meetings appears to increase program impact, with indications that assistance provided and the requirement to attend are contributors to impacts.

View Study

Filter 30 studies on RESEA interventions:

LEARN MORE

You are viewing 1 - 8 of 30 studies

View the Key

Intervention: Reemployment Eligibility Assessment

High Intervention Evidence Rating

Long-term effects of job-search assistance: Experimental evidence using administrative tax data (Manoli et al. 2018)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: JSA services

Moderate Intervention Evidence Rating

Evaluation of the strengthening the connections between unemployment insurance and the One-Stop Delivery Systems Demonstration Project in Wisconsin (Almandsmith 2006)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: Other

No Rating Intervention Evidence Rating

Measuring the effect of public labor exchange (PLX) referrals and placements in Washington and Oregon (Jacobson & Petta 2000)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: Profiling

Moderate Intervention Evidence Rating

Two essays on unemployment insurance: Claimant responses to policy changes [Comparison between claimants who applied for UI benefits after WPRS only] (Noel 1998)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: Profiling

Moderate Intervention Evidence Rating

Two essays on unemployment insurance: Claimant responses to policy changes [Comparison between claimants who applied for UI benefits before and after WPRS] (Noel 1998)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: Reemployment Eligibility Assessment

High Intervention Evidence Rating

Evaluation of impacts of the Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment (REA) Program: Final report (Klerman et al. 2019)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: More stringent work search requirements

Potentially Promising Intervention Evidence Rating

Evaluation of the perceivable demand list pilot project (Behrens 1987)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings:

Intervention: JSA services

Moderate Intervention Evidence Rating

Evaluation of the Charleston Claimant Placement and Work Test Demonstration (Corson et al. 1985)

Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis

Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence

Outcome Findings: