Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 151 - 160 of 671
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the early withdrawal of COVID-19 pandemic unemployment insurance (UI) benefits on unemployment insurance receipt, unemployment insurance benefits,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of minimum wage increases on the prevalence of subminimum wage payments, and to examine how that impact varies by the type of minimum wage increase (…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Career STREAMS program on connection to the labor market and labor market success. The Career STREAMS program integrates a Healthy Marriage and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Project SEARCH Plus Autism Spectrum Disorder Supports (PS+ASD) on employment and wages for military dependent and connected transition-aged youth…Evaluation of Travis County investments in workforce development: 2021 update (Juniper et al., 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Workforce and Education Readiness Continuum-Travis County (WERC-TC), a consortium of four workforce development service providers in Travis…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the long-term impact of WorkAdvance on employment and earnings for adults who were unemployed or earning low wages.The study was a randomized controlled trial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the long-term impact of WorkAdvance on employment and earnings for adults who were unemployed or earning low wages.The study was a randomized controlled trial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the long-term impact of WorkAdvance on employment and earnings for adults who were unemployed or earning low wages.The study was a randomized controlled trial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Transition Goals, Plans, and Success (Transition GPS) program on earnings and wages, employment, and public benefits receipt.Using…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the long-term impact of WorkAdvance on employment and earnings for adults who were unemployed or earning low wages.The study was a randomized controlled trial…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.