The study's objective was to examine the impact of state-wide implementation of Salary History Bans (SHBs) on gender earnings gap ratios.
The study used a nonexperimental design…
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 121 - 130 of 610
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Salary History Bans (SHBs) on employment and earnings outcomes by sex and age. The author conducted a difference-in-differences…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Job Search Assistance Demonstration in Washington, D.C., and Florida on Unemployment Insurance (UI) benefits receipt, earnings, and employment…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of state employment nondiscrimination acts on employment and earnings of cohabitating gay men and lesbian women. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of organizational accountability and transparency policies on merit-based pay increases. The study used an interrupted time series…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the California Paid Family Leave Program (CA-PFL) on employment and wages. The study used a difference-in-differences analysis to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Illinois Equal Pay Act of 2003 on the difference in earnings and employment outcomes for men and women. The authors used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the WorkAdvance sectoral training program on year three employment and earnings outcomes. This profile focuses on the evaluation at the Towards…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the WorkAdvance sectoral training program on year three employment and earnings outcomes. This profile focuses on the evaluation at the Per…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Greater Avenues for Independence (GAIN) program on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. This profile focuses on the outcomes for…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.