Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 121 - 130 of 671
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Medicaid expansion on employment and earnings for individuals in uninsured households with incomes below 100% of the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the time-limit reinstatement related to the work requirements of SNAP Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWD) on employment and earnings. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the time-limit reinstatement related to the work and Employment and Training (E&T) requirements of SNAP Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the time-limit reinstatement related to the work requirements of SNAP Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents (ABAWD) on employment and earnings. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of obtaining an occupational credential through licensing or certification, on employment and earnings outcomes.The study used an instrumental variable…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Compass Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program on earnings and public benefits receipt outcomes.The study used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of minimum wage tip credits on earnings and employment outcomes.The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the effects of wage tip credits on…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Carreras en Salud (Carreras) Program on education and earnings outcomes.The study used a randomized controlled trial to assign participants to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact of the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) program on employment and earnings.The study used a nonexperimental design to estimate the effects of the NMTC program on community…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Opportunity Zones (OZ) on job vacancies and wages.The study used a nonexperimental matched comparison group design. Using data from the American…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.