Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 131 - 140 of 671
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Medicaid health insurance access on annual earnings.The study used a nonexperimental design with survey data collected from the Oregon Health…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Justice Involved Individuals Seeking Employment (CBI-Emp) program on employment and earnings outcomes.The…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) programs on households’ earnings and public benefits receipt outcomes.The study used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of SNAP E&T pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. This profile focuses on the contrast between the Basic Community College…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment and Training (E&T) pilots on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt.…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.