Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 111 - 120 of 610
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of state minimum wage increases on employment. The authors used a difference-in-difference design to estimate the impacts of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) chief executive officer (CEO) compensation restrictions on the earnings…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of an increase in the state-level minimum wage on household earnings. The study is a nonexperimental comparison…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of career and technical education (CTE) programs on earnings. The authors used a nonexperimental…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of state-level collective bargaining policies on public sector employees’ wages. Using data from the …Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Quick Action Closing Fund (QACF) on per capita personal income. The authors used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the intervention on job mobility and compensation. This study uses a difference-in-difference design to compare the job mobility and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Scholars at Work (SAW) on college enrollment, wages, and employment. Using a propensity score weighting approach, this study…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the 2004 California Paid Family Leave (CA-PFL) program on young women’s employment and wages. The other chapters of the study are linked here:…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the relationship between the extended length of time of the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program’s temporary work permit for foreign STEM graduates and…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.