Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 391 - 400 of 511
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of accelerated paired courses on male African American and Latino students’ academic persistence. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Opening Doors Learning Communities on community college students’ credit accumulation and persistence. The study used a nonexperimental design…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the effects of the Accelerate You! (AY!) program on academic persistence. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes of AY! program…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Statway® math program on community college students’ earning of math credits. The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of three accelerated developmental education programs on gatekeeper (entry-level) course completion and college-level credit accumulation. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of three accelerated developmental education programs on gatekeeper (entry-level) course completion and college-level credit accumulation. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of three accelerated developmental education programs on gatekeeper (entry-level) course completion and college-level credit accumulation. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to determine the impact of participation in the Project Accel program on education outcomes for community college students. The study used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to determine the impact of an accelerated emporium developmental math course on community college students’ course completion, persistence, retention, and academic success…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of receiving year-round Pell (YRP) funding on community college students’ enrollment, credit accumulation, degree completion, employment, and earnings…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.