Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 361 - 370 of 511
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Advanced Manufacturing to Compete in a Global Economy (AMCGE) workforce training program on education outcomes. The authors used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Richland College’s Veterans-Focused Engineering Technology Project on education outcomes. The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Golden Triangle Modern Manufacturing Project on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The author used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Washington State Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training (I-BEST) program on education outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of the Pathways to Healthcare program on students’ education and employment outcomes. The study used a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Colegio Universitario de San Juan’s (CUSJ) modified electronics, engineering, and technology programs on education outcomes. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Kansas Technical Re/training Among Industry-targeted Networks (KanTRAIN) program on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The authors…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Amplifying Montana’s Advanced Manufacturing and Innovation and Industry (AMAMII) program on education outcomes. The authors used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the effects of Ivy Tech Community College’s Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training (TAACCCT) grant for enhanced Information Technology…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Consortium for Healthcare Education Online (CHEO) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. This summary contains the findings from…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.