Related Studies
RESEA
Displaying 1 - 10 of 16
RESEA
Lachowska, M., Meral, M., & Woodbury, S.A. (2016). Effects of the unemployment insurance work test on long-term employment outcomes. Labour Economics, 41, 246–265.
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Mod/high-No impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Klerman, J. A., Saunders, C., Dastrup, E., Epstein, Z., Walton, D., Adam, T., & Barnow, B. S. (2019). Evaluation of impacts of the Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment (REA) Program: Final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. [Comparison between partial REA treatment group and control group]
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Employment-Mod/high-No impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Klerman, J. A., Saunders, C., Dastrup, E., Epstein, Z., Walton, D., Adam, T., & Barnow, B. S. (2019). Evaluation of impacts of the Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment (REA) Program: Final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. [Comparison between existing REA group and partial REA group]
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Employment-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Klerman, J. A., Saunders, C., Dastrup, E., Epstein, Z., Walton, D., Adam, T., & Barnow, B. S. (2019). Evaluation of impacts of the Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment (REA) Program: Final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. [Comparison between multiple REA treatment group and single REA treatment group]
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Klerman, J. A., Saunders, C., Dastrup, E., Epstein, Z., Walton, D., Adam, T., & Barnow, B. S. (2019). Evaluation of impacts of the Reemployment and Eligibility Assessment (REA) Program: Final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. [Comparison between existing REA services group and control group]
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Behrens, J. (1987). Evaluation of the perceivable demand list pilot project. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Department of Labor.
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Black, D., Smith, J., Berger, M., & Noel, B. (2003). Is the threat of reemployment services more effective than the services themselves? Evidence from random assignments in the UI system. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1313-1327.
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEarnings and wages
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Toohey, D. (2015). Job rationing in recessions: evidence from work-search requirements. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware.
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Employment-Low-No impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Low-No impactsPublic benefit receipt
Manoli, D. S., Michaelides, M., & Patel, A. (2018). Long-term effects of job-search assistance: Experimental evidence using administrative tax data. (Report no. w24422). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Mod/high-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Director, S., & Englander, F. (1988). Requiring Unemployment Insurance recipients to register with the Public Employment Service. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 55(2), 245-258.
Topic Area: Reemployment
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Public benefits receipt-Low-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt