The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Personal Roads to Individual Development and Employment (PRIDE) program which matches medically limited TANF recipients in New York…
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 51 - 60 of 171
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Reach for Success Program which provides employment related supports in the areas of retention, advancement, and reemployment to…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED) which provided two types of subsidized employment to improve…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Cleveland’s Achieve program which offered services such as office hours and group sessions to increase retention among low wage workers at…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the New Visions Self-Sufficiency and Lifelong Learning Project (New Visions) program, which was designed to increase employment and job…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the implementation of the Work First program, a welfare-to-work program focused on employment for Detroit, MI AFDC recipients. The program was one of 11 welfare…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the nine programs included in Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education (PACE). The target populations varied by program but generally…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Employment Retention and Advancement Project (ERA)’s Career Builders Program. The program was designed to help people find careers in…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Michigan Opportunity and Skills Training (MOST) program, a welfare-to-work program focused on education and training for Detroit, MI…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the implementation of the Los Angeles Reconnections Career Academy (LARCA) program which provided high school dropouts in the Los Angeles area with education and…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.