The objective of the study was to examine the implementation of the Next STEP program which aimed to increase job-readiness and employment among persons recently released from prison. The Fort…
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 31 - 40 of 171
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Jobs-Plus which sought to increase employment and earnings among individuals living in public housing. The study authors conducted an…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of The Employment Retention and Advancement Project (ERA)’s Moving Up program in South Carolina which was designed to help people obtain and…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Ready, Willing and Able Pathways2Work program (Pathways), which provided transitional employment, internships, job search services,…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Transition, Advancement, and Growth (TAAG) program, which provided employment retention, career advancement, and case management…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Training Focused intervention which provided post-employment services to TANF-eligible single parents at the county economic…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Work Plus intervention which provided post-employment services to TANF eligible single parents at 11-county welfare department offices…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the RecycleForce program, which provided subsidized transitional employment, training and social and economic supports for formerly…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study examined the implementation of the TransitionsSF program, a transitional jobs program for noncustodial parents in San Francisco, CA. The study authors conducted an implementation…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Supporting Families Through Work, a transitional jobs program for noncustodial parents in Milwaukee, WI. The study authors conducted…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.