Causal Impact Analysis

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 231 - 240 of 1084

Work-focused cognitive behavioral therapy to complement vocational services for people with mental illness: Pilot study outcomes across a 6-month posttreatment follow-up (Kukla et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Work Success (CBTw) on employment status, hours worked per week, and hourly earnings. The study uses…
The effect of wage subsidies on piece rate workers: Evidence from the penny per pound program in Florida (Ku, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Penny Per Pound (PPP) on daily hours worked. The author used a statistical model to compare the outcomes of…
 Supporting community college students from start to degree completion: Long-term evidence from a randomized trial of CUNY's ASAP (Weiss et. al, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the effectiveness of the Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) at three City University of New York (CUNY) schools on cumulative credits earned and…
Integrating service into YouthBuild AmeriCorps HSE and diploma granting programs (The Center for Youth and Communities, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of YouthBuild AmeriCorps programs that grant both a HSE and Diploma (Combined HSE/Diploma) on employment, and education and training. The authors…
Integrating service into YouthBuild AmeriCorps HSE and diploma granting programs (The Center for Youth and Communities, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of YouthBuild AmeriCorps programs that grant a high school equivalency credential (HSE-only) on employment, and education and training. The authors…
Integrating service into YouthBuild AmeriCorps HSE and diploma granting programs (The Center for Youth and Communities, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of YouthBuild AmeriCorps programs that grant a high school diploma (Diploma-only) on employment, and education and training. The authors…
Financial literacy and education as an asset development strategy: The potential of IDA savings clubs at community action agencies (Parker, 2010)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Asset Formation Initiative’s financial education program on financial behaviors. The study used an interrupted time series design to compare…
Super savers? A randomized evaluation of commitment savings and financial counseling in New York City (Karlan et al., 2012)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a savings and financial counseling program on financial behaviors. This summary focuses on the comparison between participants in the financial…
The rent reform demonstration: Early effects on employment and housing subsidies (Riccio & Deitch, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Rent Reform Demonstration on earnings and employment among families served by the Public Housing Authority (PHA) in Lexington, Kentucky. The…
The rent reform demonstration: Early effects on employment and housing subsidies (Riccio & Deitch, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Rent Reform Demonstration on earnings and employment among families served by the Public Housing Authority (PHA) in Louisville, Kentucky.…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.