Causal Impact Analysis

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 201 - 210 of 1084

Minimum wages and restaurant employment for teens and adults in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas (Winters, 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the relationship between minimum wage changes and employment in the restaurant industry for teens ages 16–17 and adults ages 23–59 with education less than an…
The impact of a state-based workers’ compensation insurer’s risk control services on employer claim frequency and cost rates (Wurzelbacher et al., 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the risk control (RC) intervention on public benefits receipt, including workers’ compensation claim rate, workers’ compensation lost-time claim…
BOND implementation and evaluation: 2017 stage 1 interim process, participation, and impact report (Croake et. al, 2017)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) on earnings and public benefit receipt. The study was a randomized controlled trial. Using…
Effect of evidence-based supported employment vs transitional work on achieving steady work among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (Davis et. al, 2018)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of individual placement and support (IPS)-supported employment on employment and earnings outcomes for Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (…
Employment outcomes from VA vocational services involving Transitional Work for veterans with a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder (Davis et. al, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Transitional Work (TW) on competitive employment outcomes for Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). This study was a…
Long-term effects of evidence-based supported employment on earnings and on SSI and SSDI participation among individuals with psychiatric disabilities (Cook et. al, 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Employment Intervention Demonstration Program (EIDP) on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. The study used a…
Positive impact of IPS supported employment on PTSD-related occupational-psychosocial functional outcomes: Results from a VA randomized-controlled trial (Mueller et. al, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) supported employment on mental well-being as it pertains to everyday functioning (work or school life and…
Employment outcomes from VA vocational services involving transitional work for veterans with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (Davis et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of engaging in transitional work on outcomes measuring competitive employment and income for U.S. military veterans with post-traumatic stress…
Prison work-release programs and incarcerated women's labor market outcomes (Jung & LaLonde, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Adult Transition Centers (ATCs) on quarterly earnings and employment.  The study used a quasi-experimental design to compare outcomes before…
New insights into the back on track model's effects on opportunity youth outcomes: Opportunity works final evaluation report (Anderson et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Back on Track framework on obtaining a high school credential and being disconnected from both work and school. The authors investigated similar…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.