Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 11 - 20 of 111
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of active workstations on total sedentary behavior for office workers who were overweight or obese. This profile focuses on the comparison between the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of occupational safety and health enforcement on health and safety, as measured by non-repeat safety violation rates and overall safety violation rates…The disaster worker resiliency training program: A randomized clinical trial (Mahaffey et al., 2021)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Disaster Worker Resiliency Training Program (DWRT) on health outcomes.The study used a randomized controlled trial that assigned disaster…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of four different formats of delivering construction safety training content on safety knowledge test scores.The study was a nonexperimental design…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Live Healthy, Work Healthy (LHWH) program on health outcomes. The authors investigated similar research questions for another contrast, the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) on health outcomes. The authors investigated similar research questions for another contrast,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based intervention (bMBI) on health outcomes.The study was an interrupted time series design using participant questionnaires…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Colleagues Meeting to Promote and Sustain Satisfaction (COMPASS) group intervention on health and attitude outcomes.The study used a randomized…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a primary care resident wellness intervention on health outcomes.The study used an interrupted time series design with survey data completed by…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Lifejackets for Lobstermen program on safety outcomes.The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare the behaviors and attitudes regarding…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.