Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 111
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of iThrive, a workplace wellness program developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, on employment, productivity, …Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a yoga and mindfulness intervention on health outcomes.The study used an interrupted time series design to compare reported stress levels of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a workplace corrective exercise program (CEP) on health outcomes.The author used an interrupted time series design to compare health outcomes before…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based self-care (MBSC) program on health outcomes among health care workers. The study used a randomized controlled trial…Improving health and economic security by reducing work schedule uncertainty (Harknett et al., 2021)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Seattle's Secure Scheduling ordinance on worker health and safety.The study used a nonexperimental design to compare outcomes between hourly workers…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impacts of conditional and unconditional cash transfers on child labor and education outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial conducted in…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Mental Health Treatment Study (MHTS), which provided supported employment services to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education Professional Development (CARE PD) on health outcomes. The study used an interrupted time…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CCBT) and Mindfulness-Based Mobile Applications (MBMA) on health outcomes. This profile focuses on the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CCBT) and Mindfulness-Based Mobile Applications (MBMA) on health outcomes. This profile focuses on the…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.