Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of AgrAbility projects on health outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the quality of life (QOL) scores and independent living…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Behavioral Activation therapy with a goal of returning to work (BA-W) on employment and health outcomes. The study used an interrupted time series…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Project SEARCH plus Autism Spectrum Disorder Supports (PS+ASD) on employment and health outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial. Using…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) Connection Program on employment, education, and health outcomes. The study used an…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the nonprofit…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the nonprofit…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the nonprofit…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of iThrive, a workplace wellness program developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, on employment, productivity, employer benefits …Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the STAR intervention, designed to increase employees’ social support and sense of control over work and schedules, on perceived stress and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of standing desks on body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and workplace satisfaction. The authors used a randomized controlled trial to…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.