Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 91 - 100 of 375
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Working towards Wellness which provided telephonic care management to Medicaid recipients with children under the age of 18 who were…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Back to Work (B2W) program which provides job search assistance for low-skilled, unemployed TANF and cash assistance applicants in New…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Independent Job Search (IJS) program which provided job search assistance for unemployed TANF and cash assistance applicants in New…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project (the Hard-to-Employ project) which sought to address the…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Valuing Individual Success and Increasing Opportunities Now (VISION) which provided pre- and post-employment services to unemployed…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Family Rewards program which awarded cash incentives to low-income families in New York City for completion of select education and…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The objective of the study was to examine the implementation of Bridges to Pathways, which provided academic, employment, and social-emotional development services for justice-involved young men.…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Illinois Future Steps which provides individualized case management and support for low-income adults in rural areas seeking…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Work Advancement and Support Center (WASC) Program which provides career coaching and welfare enrollment support for low-income…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a conditional cash transfer program, Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH), on child school and work participation. The study was a randomized controlled…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.