Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 81 - 90 of 375
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Minnesota Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (MSTED) which provided two types of subsidized employment to improve…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on individuals’ reasons for working part-time (due to health issues or to other factors)…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Cleveland’s Achieve program which offered services such as office hours and group sessions to increase retention among low wage workers at…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the implementation of the Work First program, a welfare-to-work program focused on employment for Detroit, MI AFDC recipients. The program was one of 11 welfare…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Employment Retention and Advancement Project (ERA)’s Career Builders Program. The program was designed to help people find careers in…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Michigan Opportunity and Skills Training (MOST) program, a welfare-to-work program focused on education and training for Detroit, MI…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the effect of the Veterans Homelessness Prevention Demonstration (VHPD) program on the employment, earnings, public benefit receipt, and education and training outcomes of…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Los Angeles Regional Initiative for Social Enterprise (LA:RISE) program which serves youth and adults with justice/criminal…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.