Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 121 - 130 of 482
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of using a risk management process on the fire department’s average monthly crash rate and crash rate trends, as well as on crash rates and trends…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of using a risk management process on a fire department’s average monthly crash rate and crash rate trends. The authors investigated similar…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of using a risk management process on the fire department’s average monthly crash rate and crash rate trends overall, as well as on rates and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a teamwork intervention on participants’ job satisfaction, perceived level of teamwork at work, and satisfaction with the perceived level of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact of an online patient simulation (OPS) for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) on nursing and social work college students’ attitudes,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of My Unlimited Potential, a lifestyle modification intervention, on cardiometabolic risk factors including body mass index (BMI) and glycated…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Michigan Opportunity and Skills Training (MOST)/Work First on public benefit receipt, employment, and earnings. The study was a randomized…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Carreras en Salud (Carreras) on education outcomes. The authors investigated similar research questions for other programs, the profiles of which…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Health Careers for All (HCA) on education outcomes. The authors investigated similar research questions for other programs, the profiles of which…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Bridge to Employment in the Healthcare Industry (BTH) on education outcomes. The authors investigated similar research questions for other…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.