Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This study combined data from an impact evaluation and an associated process study of the Transitional Employment Intervention (TEI) to identify effective supported employment services for people…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This study followed a sample of working-age Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) program recipients for five years after their first benefit award to describe how certain factors helped or…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This study used administrative data files constructed for the Ticket to Work (TTW) evaluation. These files contained extensive information on the more than 20 million Disability Insurance or…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This study followed a cohort of working-age Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance recipients participating in the Ticket to Work (TTW) program for several years to…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This article described the variation in employment rates of Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income recipients over time and across states using a consistent…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This study produced statistics on the first month of suspension or termination for work for Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI)-only recipients. It also…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
In 15 rigorous evaluations, Individual Placement and Supprt (IPS) has demonstrated better competitive employment outcomes for people with severe mental illness (SMI) than day treatment or other…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This exploratory study reinterviewed 38 participants in two supported employment studies 8 to 12 years later to examine their long-term employment trajectories. Both groups were adults with…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Natural support programs use existing job-site routines, people, and methods, rather than job coaches, to assist workers with severe disabilities. This exploratory cost-benefit analysis used data…Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
This study used data from the New Beneficiary Survey and claims folders to describe the experiences of recipients’ experiences under Social Security Disability Insurance (DI) work incentive…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.