The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Health Professions Pathways (H2P) Consortium, a program offered by nine community and technical colleges with partnerships from…
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 21 - 30 of 171
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Linn-Benton Community College’s (LBCC) iLearn intervention, which was designed to assist workers with completing post-secondary education…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the CCC2NAU program which helps students attending Coconino Community College (CCC) transition to Northern Arizona University (NAU) to…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Accelerating Connections to Employment (ACE) program, which was administered across nine sites with partnerships between Workforce…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to document how grantee activities were completed compared to the original work plan and the process, strengths, and challenges of program implementation from design to…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Design-It, Build-It, Ship-It (DBS) consortium, which was administered in the San Francisco Bay Area in community colleges and…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Project IMPACT (Innovations Moving People to Achieve Certified Training), created by a Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Credentials to Careers (C2C) program on earnings. The study authors conducted an implementation evaluation using data collected…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Intentional Networks Transforming Effective and Rigorous Facilitation of Assessment, Collaboration, and Education (INTERFACE) program…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Southwest Virginia Community College’s (SWCC) Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training (TAACCCT) grant, the…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.