Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 11 - 20 of 171
Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the extent to which the Community College Consortium for Bioscience Credentials (c3bc) colleges carried out core activities of the grant in terms of: 1)…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Bridging the Gap program, administered across nine technical and community colleges in West Virginia with partnerships between…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Leveraging, Integrating, Networking, Coordinating Supplies (LINCS), a program offered through a consortium of nine state and community…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Minnesota Advanced Manufacturing Partnership (MnAMP) project, which developed the Learn Work Earn learning model to address workforce…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the New Mexico Skill Up Network Pathway Acceleration in Technology and Healthcare (SUN PATH) program, which was a capacity building effort…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Ivy Tech’s Pathways to Information Technology grant, which enhanced the college’s Information Technology (IT) training courses, on…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the extent to which program implementation strategies, services, and activities were implemented as planned and how well they were implemented. The study…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study's objective was to conduct a formative evaluation of the Advanced Manufacturing Education (AME) Alliance to determine the extent to which the project was implemented as intended on…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of Heroes for Hire (H4H), an intervention that aimed to serve veterans and trade-affected or dislocated workers through skills upgrading and…Study Type: Implementation Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the implementation of the Greater Cincinnati Manufacturing Careers Accelerator (GCMCA) to prepare students for employment in manufacturing and welding in Ohio…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.