The registered apprenticeship and work-based learning topic area includes reviews of studies examining the effectiveness of work-based training programs on participants’ employment and earnings outcomes. CLEAR assessed the strength of causal evidence provided in each study and summarized each study’s design, methods, findings, and the program examined.
Registered Apprenticeship and Work-Based Learning
Status: Literature reviewed in this evidence review covers 2005 – 2023. An updated review protocol has been posted as of June 2024.
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 11 - 20 of 108
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of internships and cooperative programs at community colleges on post-graduation wages. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Youth Career Connect (YCC) on education outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes of students who participated…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of work-integrated learning (WIL) on employment. The study used a nonexperimental design to determine whether participation in WIL predicted…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Adult Transition Centers (ATC) on earnings and employment two- and three-years following release. The study used a nonexperimental design…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the TechHire Partnership Grants (TechHire) and the Strengthening Working Families Initiative (SWFI) on employment, earnings, and completion of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of school-to-work (STW) programs on unemployment. The study used a nonexperimental design with data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of registered apprenticeships on employment and earnings for dislocated workers. This study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Career and Technical Education (CTE) high schools on receipt of the Regents diploma. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Urban Alliance High School Internship Program on education, employment, and earnings. The study used a randomized controlled trial to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Community Restitution Apprenticeship-Focused Training (CRAFT) on employment and education outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.