Causal Impact Analysis

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 581 - 590 of 1084

The impact of career mentoring and psychosocial mentoring on affective organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover intention (Craig et al 2013)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
This study examines the relationship between mentoring and employees’ employment outcomes. Specifically, the study examines the relationship between psychosocial mentoring and turnover intention.…
Tuning in to local labor markets: Findings from the Sectoral Employment impact study (Maguire et al. 2010)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Wisconsin Regional Training Partnership’s (WRTP) sectoral employment program on earnings and employment. The study was based on a randomized…
Implementation of risk management programs: Identification of best practices to reduce injuries and maximize economic benefits (Burgess 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of risk management practices on mine worker health and safety outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the differences in 25-year…
Effect of control order on steering a simulated underground coal shuttle car (Burgess-Limerick, Zupanc, & Wallis 2013)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of first-order and second-order joystick controls on mining shuttle car steering accuracy over multiple trials. The study was a randomized controlled…
The Mining Healthy Worksite Program (Cherniack 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Mining Healthy Worksite Program (MHWP) on mine worker health and safety outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to assess self-…
The real effects of mandated information on social responsibility in financial reports: Evidence from mine-safety records (Christensen et al. 2017)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of mine safety disclosures (MSD) on health and safety outcomes. The authors used a difference-in-differences model to compare the changes in safety…
Evaluating the effectiveness of mine safety enforcement actions in forecasting the lost-days rate at specific worksites (Gernand 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) inspection violations on future accidents and injuries in underground coal mines. The author used…
Evaluation of automated vs. manual bagger exposures related to ergonomics, dust, and noise at a sand mine processing plant (Wilson 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of an automated bagging system on mine worker health and safety outcomes. Using data from a sand mining plant, the author used an interrupted time…
Sector-focused career centers evaluation: Effects on employment and earnings after one year (Gasper & Henderson 2014)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of sector-focused career centers in New York City on employment and earnings. The authors estimated the effect of sector-focused career centers by…
Tuning in to local labor markets: Findings from the Sectoral Employment impact study (Maguire et al. 2010)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Jewish Vocational Service (JVS)-Boston sectoral employment program on earnings and employment. The study was based on a randomized controlled…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.