Causal Impact Analysis

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 301 - 310 of 1084

Do state corporate tax incentives create jobs? Quasi-experimental evidence from the entertainment industry (Thom, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research questions for…
Do state corporate tax incentives create jobs? Quasi-experimental evidence from the entertainment industry (Thom, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research questions for…
Three essays in applied microeconomics: Medicaid expansion, CeMENT co-authorship networks, and occupational licensing (Na, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study examines the impact of Occupational Licensing (holding an active job certification or license) on hourly wages, weekly earnings, and hours worked per week. Using data from…
The effect of wellness programs on long-term contract employees’ workplace stress, absenteeism, and presenteeism (Valentine et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a dance aerobic exercise intervention on workplace stress, absenteeism, and presenteeism (being present at work when ill or otherwise unfit to…
Policy shifts: Evidence from inflation targeting and Social Security reforms (Cruz, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the 1983 Social Security reforms on employment status, hours worked, and receipt of disability benefits. The author used a difference…
Effect of a workplace wellness program on employee health and economic outcomes: A randomized clinical trial (Song & Baicker, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a workplace wellness program on employees’ tenure, absenteeism, cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity. This study was a…
Effects of Flipgrid for training on job satisfaction in adjunct clinical nursing faculty in a baccalaureate nursing program (Quimba, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a virtual training platform, Flipgrid, on job satisfaction among adjunct clinical nursing faculty. The study was a randomized…
The short-run effects of the minimum wage on employment and labor market participation: Evidence from an individual-level panel (Boffy-Ramirez, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of minimum wage increases on unemployment and labor force participation using a national data set. The author estimated the near-term…
The use of proactive risk management to reduce emergency service vehicle crashes among firefighters (Bui et al. 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of using a risk management process on the fire department’s average monthly crash rate and crash rate trends, as well as on crash rates and trends…
The use of proactive risk management to reduce emergency service vehicle crashes among firefighters (Bui et al. 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of using a risk management process on a fire department’s average monthly crash rate and crash rate trends. The authors investigated similar…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.