Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a workplace financial education program on financial behaviors. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the financial behaviors of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Achieving Success by Promoting Readiness for Education and Employment (ASPIRE) services on employment. The study used a nonexperimental design…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Post-Secondary Education and Rehabilitation Transition (PERT) program on employment and earnings outcomes. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Virtual Interview Training for Transition Age Youth (VIT-TAY) on employment outcomes for transition-age youth with disabilities. The study used…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Putting Your Best Foot Forward: Job Search Skills Training for Youth with Visual Impairments on employment. The study was a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of AgrAbility projects on health outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the quality of life (QOL) scores and independent…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of vocational rehabilitation (VR) services on employment and earnings outcomes for youth with co-occurring mental illness and substance use disorder.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of vocational rehabilitation (VR) services on employment outcomes for Asian Americans with disabilities. The study used a nonexperimental design…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of access to workplace accommodations on public benefits receipt for individuals with psychiatric disabilities. The study used a nonexperimental…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of vocational rehabilitation (VR) services on employment and earnings outcomes for transition-age youth with depressive disorders. The study…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.