The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) on earnings, employment, education, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses…
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 101 - 110 of 226
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) on earnings, employment, education, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) on earnings, employment, education, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) on education, earnings, employment, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) on earnings, education, employment, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) on earnings, education, employment, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Grameen America on employment outcomes. The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned participants to either the treatment or control…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Bridges to Career Opportunities (BCO) program on employment. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare employment outcomes of BCO…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the effect of the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) program on earnings and employment outcomes for justice-involved veterans with at least one prior…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Individualized Placement and Support (IPS) program on employment outcomes for justice-involved veterans experiencing homelessness. The study…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
