The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Ready to Work (RTW) Partnership Grant Program on earnings, employment, education, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses on…
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 61 - 70 of 610
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Ready to Work (RTW) Partnership Grant Program on earnings, employment, education, and public benefits receipt outcomes. This profile focuses on…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Year Up program on long-term earnings. The study used a randomized controlled trial to assign participants to the Year Up program or the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) on earnings and public benefits receipt. This profile focuses on the comparison between the group…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) on earnings and public benefits receipt. This profile focuses on the comparison between the group…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) on earnings and public benefits receipt. This profile focuses on the comparison between the group…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Broadened Horizons, Brighter Futures (BHBF) on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt outcomes. The study was a randomized…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Post-Secondary Education and Rehabilitation Transition (PERT) program on employment and earnings outcomes. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of NAVIGATE on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned community mental…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of work incentives benefits counseling (WIBC) on employment and earnings for individuals with intellectual disabilities. The study used a…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.