Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 61 - 70 of 92
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the First Year Initiative (FYI) program on community college students’ re-enrollment rates and successful completion of developmental math and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of the Advancement via Individual Determination Higher Education (AVID HE), a developmental education program, on first generation college students’…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to compare the impact of two accelerated pathway models (course redesign and compression) on completion rates for community college students. This summary focuses on the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of two accelerated pathway models (course redesign and compression) on completion rates for community college students. This summary focuses on the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of an embedded cognitive rehabilitation intervention on employment and earnings. The study was a randomized controlled trial with the authors using…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the effects of the Accelerate You! (AY!) program on academic persistence. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes of AY! program…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of three accelerated developmental education programs on gatekeeper (entry-level) course completion and college-level credit accumulation. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the relationship between Certified Peer Specialist training and employment for training participants. The authors compared employment rates for participants before and after the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impacts of a telephone care management program, Working toward Wellness (WtW), on low-income depressed parents’ employment and earnings. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of learning communities on academic progression among students in need of developmental English courses at Merced Community College in Merced,…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.