Moderate Causal Evidence

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 41 - 50 of 186

Assessing financial education: Evidence from boot camp (Skimmyhorn, 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Personal Financial Management Course (PFMC) on financial behaviors. The study used a difference-in-differences design to compare outcomes…
Outcomes of on-line financial education for chronically ill rural women (Haynes et al., 2011)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of an online financial education module on financial knowledge. This profile focuses on the comparison between the less intensive intervention group…
Financial education and savings outcomes for low-income IDA participants: Does age make a difference? (Grinstein-Weiss et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of participation in an Individual Development Accounts (IDA) program on savings for individuals living in poverty. The study used a matched…
Effects of an Individual Development Account program on retirement saving: Follow-up evidence from a randomized experiment (Grinstein-Weiss et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the American Dream Demonstration (ADD) on retirement savings contributions. The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned…
Evaluating a financial education curriculum as an intervention to improve financial behaviors and financial well-being of survivors of domestic violence: Results from a longitudinal randomized controlled study (Postmus et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Moving Ahead Through Financial Management program on financial knowledge, financial intentions, and financial behavior outcomes. The study…
First‐year impacts on savings and economic well‐being from the Assets for Independence program randomized evaluation (Mills et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Assets for Independence (AFI) program on financial behaviors. The study used a randomized controlled trial to assign participants to the…
Case management strategies to promote employment for transition-age youth with disabilities (McCormick et al., 2021)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Achieving Success by Promoting Readiness for Education and Employment (ASPIRE) services on employment. The study used a nonexperimental design…
The youth transition demonstration project in Miami, Florida: Design, implementation, and three-year impacts (Fraker et al., 2018)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Broadened Horizons, Brighter Futures (BHBF) on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt outcomes. The study was a randomized…
The effects of youth transition programs on labor market outcomes of youth with disabilities (Dean et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Post-Secondary Education and Rehabilitation Transition (PERT) program on employment and earnings outcomes. The study used a…
Supported employment and education in comprehensive, integrated care for first episode psychosis: Effects on work, school, and disability income (Rosenheck et. al, 2017)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of NAVIGATE on employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt. The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned community mental…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.