Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 95
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) on employment, education, earnings, and public benefit receipt three years after participants were…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Reintegration of Ex-Offenders (RExO) programs on employment, earnings, public benefits receipt, and recidivism outcomes. The study was a randomized…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Mental Health Treatment Study (MHTS), which provided supported employment services to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
This study’s objective was to examine short-term (that is, 6- to 12-month) impacts of the Demonstration to Maintain Independence and Employment (DMIE). DMIE was implemented in Hawaii, Kansas,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Bridge to Employment program on education, employment, earnings, and public benefits receipt.The study used a randomized controlled trial to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a behavioral intervention designed to improve work search compliance among Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants in the state of Washington. The…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a behavioral intervention designed to improve work search compliance among Unemployment Insurance (UI) claimants in North Carolina. The study…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Job Corps on long-term earnings, employment, and public benefits receipt.The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned youth to a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Promoting Opportunity Demonstration (POD) on earnings, employment, and public benefits receipt.This study used a randomized controlled trial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to evaluate the impact of four employment coaching programs serving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients and adults with low incomes on earnings and…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
