Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 21 - 30 of 55
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of five-minute intervention strategies on health outcomes.The study used an interrupted time series design with data from pre- and post-intervention…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT) on health outcomes.This study used a nonexperimental comparison group design. Using survey data and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a residential Mindfulness-based Resilience Immersion Training (MBRT-I) on health outcomes.The study used an interrupted time series design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of occupational licensing requirements for transportation network company drivers on the safety and quality of rides. This profile summarizes findings…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of text messages on health and safety knowledge and behaviors. This study used a nonexperimental design to compare ergonomics knowledge and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Long-Lasting Permethrin-Impregnated (LLPI) clothing on health and safety outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of AgrAbility projects on health outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the quality of life (QOL) scores and independent…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode (RAISE) Connection Program on employment, education, and health outcomes. The study…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact of a ban on spray-on asbestos materials, implemented under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), on health and safety outcomes for…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a workshop providing teachers with information about emotional labor and coping strategies on burnout, helpful coping skills, and unhelpful…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Domain
Effectiveness icon
