Education and skills gains-Low-No impacts

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 31 - 40 of 74

Oregon Credentials, Acceleration and Support for Employment (CASE) evaluation report: Results, key issues and implications for policy, practice and systems (Watrus & Fercho 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Credentials, Acceleration and Support for Employment (CASE) program on education and employment outcomes. The authors used a nonexperimental…
The impact of culinary student extracurricular work experience on graduate persistence in the foodservice industry (Mesch 2010)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study examined the relationship between participation in extracurricular food service employment during culinary arts training and two eligible outcomes: students’ post-graduation employment in…
The impact of culinary student extracurricular work experience on graduate persistence in the foodservice industry (Mesch 2010)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study examined the relationship between participation in extracurricular food service employment during culinary arts training and the proportion of culinary arts courses students successfully…
North Dakota State College of Science TAACCCT Project: North Dakota Advanced Manufacturing Skills Training Initiative (NDAMSTI) final evaluation report (WorkED Consulting, 2017)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the North Dakota Advanced Manufacturing Skills Training Initiative (NDAMSTI) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The authors used a…
Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training II Grant Program (TAACCCT II): Summative Evaluation of the University of District of Columbia, Community College’s Transportation Academy (Yoder & Ryland 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the TAACCCT funded Transportation Academy program on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to…
Oklahoma City Community College TAACCCT: Commercial Food Equipment Service Technician (CFEST) program third-party evaluation final report (WorkED Consulting 2018)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Commercial Food Equipment Service Technician (CFEST) program on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental…
Southern Regional Technical College TAACCCT: Healthcare Career Works! (HCW) program third-party evaluation final report (WorkED Consulting 2018)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Healthcare Career Works! (HCW) program on education outcomes. The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare differences in education…
Knowledge to work summative evaluation: Lord Fairfax Community College (Voorhees 2018)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of the Knowledge to Work (K2W) program on education outcomes. The study used a non-experimental design to compare participants in the K2W program with…
Final evaluation of Southwest Virginia Community College’s PluggedInVA TAACCCT Grant initiative (Topper et al. 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the PluggedInVA (PIVA) program on education and employment outcomes. Using college administrative and state workforce data, the authors conducted a…
Third-party evaluation services for the Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training grant final report (Selzer et al. 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Low Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Arizona Sun Corridor Get Into Energy Consortium (ASC-GIEC) program on student education outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.