Skip to main content

From unemployment to self-employment: The role of entrepreneurship training [Minnesota] (Michaelides & Davis, 2020)

Review Guidelines

Absence of conflict of interest. 

Citation

Michaelides, M., & Davis, S. (2020). From unemployment to self-employment: The role of entrepreneurship training. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 10(18), 1-35. https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/izajolp-2020-0018 [Minnesota]

Highlights

  • The study's objective was to examine the impact of Growing America Through Entrepreneurship (GATE) on earnings and employment. This profile focuses on the study at the Minnesota site. The authors investigated similar research questions for other sites, the profiles of which can be found here:
  • The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned participants to the treatment or control group. The primary data sources were a post-training survey and participant employment characteristics observed by the researchers once the training was complete. The authors used statistical models to compare the outcomes of the treatment and control groups. 
  • The study found that program participants had significantly higher self-employment rates than control group participants.  
  • This study receives a moderate evidence rating. This means we are somewhat confident that the estimated effects are attributable to Growing America Through Entrepreneurship (GATE), but other factors might also have contributed. 

Intervention Examined

Growing America Through Entrepreneurship (GATE)

Features of the Intervention

The GATE project is a government-sponsored entrepreneurship training program established in 2003. It aimed to help unemployed workers who lost jobs in various sectors become reemployed by starting their own businesses. GATE was implemented in Duluth and the twin cities and targeted unemployed working aged adults. Program participants could attend workshops which focused on developing a business plan, applying for business loans, hiring, and establishing customer relationships. They could also receive personal advice from counselors who could assess the viability of business plans, refer participants to other resources, and provide some technical assistance related to loan applications. Counselors also referred to some with non-viable business plans to seek traditional employment when appropriate. Training providers including community colleges, community-based organizations (CBOs), small business development centers, and local employment offices delivered the intervention following selection by DOL.  

Features of the Study

The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned unemployed individuals who applied to participate in the GATE program to the treatment or control group. The study sample included 869 individuals; 430 who were randomly assigned to the treatment group and 439 who were randomly assigned to the control group. Treatment group participants received the GATE intervention, control group participants did not receive GATE program services but could access similar services in the community on their own initiative. The study sample was primarily male (62.7%) and non-white (77.7%) with a smaller percentage of individuals with disabilities (7.3%). Over half of participants were aged 35 to 54, 45.4% had a college degree, 25.7% had incoming self-employment experience, and most participants had less than $49,999 in household income at application. The primary data sources were a post-training survey and participant employment characteristics observed by the researchers once the training was complete. The authors used statistical models to compare the outcomes of the treatment and control groups. 

Findings

Earnings and wages

  • The study did not find significant differences between the treatment and control groups on earnings outcomes.  

Employment

  • The study found that receipt of GATE services significantly increased self-employment rates relative to the control group. 

Considerations for Interpreting the Findings

Although this study was a randomized controlled trial, it suffers from high attrition. However, the authors ensured that the groups being compared were similar before the intervention. Therefore, the study is eligible for a moderate evidence rating.  

Causal Evidence Rating

The quality of causal evidence presented in this report is moderate, because it was a randomized controlled trial with high attrition, but the authors ensured that the groups being compared were similar before the intervention. This means we are somewhat confident that the estimated effects are attributable to Growing America Through Entrepreneurship (GATE), but other factors might also have contributed. 

Reviewed by CLEAR

May 2024