This topic area focuses on the effectiveness of interventions designed to help equip adults to plan for and succeed in preparing for retirement and to increase general financial literacy knowledge to improve money management. CLEAR conducted a systematic evidence review on the topic, assessed the quality of the causal evidence, and summarized each study’s approach, findings, and elements of the intervention examined.
Financial Literacy
Status: Literature reviewed in this topic area currently covers 2008 - 2022.
Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 51 - 58 of 58
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Five Steps program provided in three different formats (video, written narrative, video and narrative) on financial literacy knowledge for…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of financial literacy training provided in four different formats (video narrative, written narrative, informational brochure, interactive visual…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of financial literacy training provided in four different formats (video narrative, written narrative, informational brochure, interactive visual…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of financial literacy training provided in four different formats (video narrative, written narrative, informational brochure, interactive visual…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the $aveNYC program on savings behavior. The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare the savings of individuals who…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Asset Formation Initiative’s financial education program on financial behaviors. The study used an interrupted time series design to compare…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a savings and financial counseling program on financial behaviors. This summary focuses on the comparison between participants in the financial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a financial education course on financial knowledge and behaviors for homeless families. The study was a randomized controlled trial that…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.