Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the New Orleans Office of Workforce Development (OWD) Career Pathways training program on employment, earnings, and job satisfaction. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a virtual training platform, Flipgrid, on job satisfaction among adjunct clinical nursing faculty. The study was a randomized…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a teamwork intervention on participants’ job satisfaction, perceived level of teamwork at work, and satisfaction with the perceived level of…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact of an online patient simulation (OPS) for screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) on nursing and social work college students’ attitudes,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a work-family intervention targeting employee control over work schedule and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on employees’ sleep quantity…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine how participating in a study-designed program called the Jornada Intervention affected undergraduate female engineering students’ attitudes toward and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of facilitating Build IT, an extracurricular information technology (IT) program for middle-school girls, on the facilitators’ interest in STEM…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to estimate the effects of a one-day annual conference on middle school girls’ (grades 6–8) and their parents’ interest in and knowledge of science, technology,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of participation in a Small Business Development Center (SBDC) seminar on intentions to start a business. The author administered a survey of his own…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.