Health and safety-Mod/high-Favorable impacts

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 1 - 10 of 22

Effect of a brief mindfulness-based program on stress in healthcare professionals at a U.S. biomedical research hospital (Ameli et al., 2020)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based self-care (MBSC) program on health outcomes among health care workers. The study used a randomized controlled trial…
Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention (BMBI) to decrease stress and improve well-being in secondary school teachers (Roberts, 2020)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based intervention on the health and wellness outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the…
Positive impact of IPS supported employment on PTSD-related occupational-psychosocial functional outcomes: Results from a VA randomized-controlled trial (Mueller et. al, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) supported employment on mental well-being as it pertains to everyday functioning (work or school life and…
Testing two subsidized employment models for TANF recipients: Final impacts and costs of the Los Angeles County transitional subsidized employment program (Anderson et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the…
Randomized safety inspections and risk exposure on the job: Quasi-experimental estimates of the value of a statistical life (Lee & Taylor, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of surprise plant inspections conducted by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) on plants’ fatality rates and average…
What do workplace wellness programs do? Evidence from the Illinois workplace wellness study (Jones, Molitor, & Reif, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of iThrive, a workplace wellness program developed at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, on employment, productivity,…
Effectiveness of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear program for reducing slipping-related injuries in food service workers: a cluster randomized trial (Bell, Collins & Chiou, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The report's objective was to examine the impact of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear (SRF) program on slip-related work injuries. This study is a cluster-level randomized…
Effectiveness of an energy management training course on employee well-being: a randomized controlled trial (Das et al. 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of an employee well-being program on general health, mental health, physical functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, role…
Long-term impacts of the CARE program on teachers' self-reported social and emotional competence and well-being (Jennings et. al, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE) program on psychological distress and physical health. The CARE program is a mindfulness-…
Mindfulness training reduces stress at work: A randomized controlled trial (Chin et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a high-dosage United Mindfulness System on health and safety. This study was a randomized controlled trial. Perceived stress was…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.