Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Behavioral Activation therapy with a goal of returning to work (BA-W) on employment and health outcomes. The study used an interrupted time series…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a workplace wellness program on employees’ tenure, absenteeism, cholesterol, hypertension, and obesity. This study was a randomized…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of using a risk management process on a fire department’s average monthly crash rate and crash rate trends. The authors investigated similar research…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a work-family intervention targeting employee control over work schedule and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on employees’ sleep quantity…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the intervention on the health and safety of oncology nurses through their use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during hazardous drug…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Trickle Up and Trickle Up Plus programs on children’s exposure to work-related hazards and abuse, and children’s work-related health outcomes.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Trickle Up and Trickle Up Plus programs on children’s exposure to work-related hazards and abuse, and children’s work-related health outcomes.…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to determine the effect of OSHA inspections and inspection procedures on injury rates in manufacturing firms between 1980 and 1985. Although OSHA no longer operates as it…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to determine the effect of Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) inspections on noncompliance with OSHA standards and the effect of noncompliance on lost-…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the effects of OSHA inspections and penalties at the industry level on workplace injuries between 1972 and 1975. Although OSHA no longer operates as it did during…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Domain
Effectiveness icon
