Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 16
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of active workstations on total sedentary behavior for office workers who were overweight or obese. This profile focuses on the comparison between the…The disaster worker resiliency training program: A randomized clinical trial (Mahaffey et al., 2021)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Disaster Worker Resiliency Training Program (DWRT) on health outcomes.The study used a randomized controlled trial that assigned disaster…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) on health outcomes. The authors investigated similar research questions for another contrast,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a sit-stand protocol on health outcomes.The study used a randomized controlled trial design to assign dental hygiene students to either the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of cooling technologies on agricultural workers’ health and safety.The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned workers to one of three…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of cooling interventions on agricultural workers’ health and safety.The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned workers to one of three…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of active workstations on total sedentary behavior for office workers who were overweight or obese. This profile focuses on the comparison between the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Vales+Tú, a workplace injury risk-reduction program, on health and safety among Latino day laborers (LDLs). This profile focuses on the contrast…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to determine whether a job skills training intervention, the Job Seekers’ Workshop (JSW), improved employment outcomes and reduced alcohol use among an American Indian…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Stand and Move at Work intervention on health outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial. Using data collected via…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Domain
Effectiveness icon
