Search for Studies
Search for Studies will search all study profiles and synthesis reports. Use Search the Site in the upper right to search for all site content such as the CLEAR review process. View Help using this Search.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 98 results
Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using in-group experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. [one of three studies described in a single report]
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172-208.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using in-group experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. [one of three studies described in a single report]
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using in-group experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. [one of three studies described in a single report]
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Women.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Milgram, D. (2011). How to recruit women and girls to the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) classroom. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(3), 4-11.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Demetry, C., Hubelbank, J., Blaisdell, S., Sontgerath, S., Nicholson, M.E., Rosenthal, E., & Quinn, P. (2009). Supporting young women to enter engineering: Long-term effects of a middle school engineering outreach program for girls. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 15, 119-142.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Costello, C. (2012). Increasing opportunities for low-income women and student parents in science, technology, engineering, and math at community colleges. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Bakian, A.V., & Sullivan, K.A. (2010). The Effectiveness of Institutional Intervention on Minimizing Demographic Inertia and Improving the Representation of Women Faculty in Higher Education. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2(2), 207-234.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Bilimoria, D., & Liang, X. (2011). Gender Equity in Science and Engineering: Advancing Change in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:
