Search for Studies
Search for Studies will search all study profiles and synthesis reports. Use Search the Site in the upper right to search for all site content such as the CLEAR review process. View Help using this Search.
Ampaw, F., & Jaeger, A. (2011). Understanding the factors affecting degree completion of doctoral women in the science and engineering fields. New Directions for Institutional Research, 152, 59-73.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Bailey, M., Marchetti, C., DeBartolo, E., Mozrall, J., Williams, G., Baum, S., & LaLonde, S. (2011). Establishing the foundation for future organizational reform and transformation at a large private university to expand the representation of women faculty. Proceedings of the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Washington, DC.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Glasser, H. (2011). Arguing separate but equal: A study of argumentation in public single-sex science classes in the United States. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(1), 70-92.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using in-group experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255-270. [one of three studies described in a single report]
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Rice, K., Lopez, F., Richardson, C., & Stinson, J. (2013). Perfectionism moderates stereotype threat effects on STEM majors’ academic performance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 287-293.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Outcome Effectiveness:Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048-1073.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Wang, M., Eccles, J., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770-775.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Washington, DC: Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Denner, J., Werner, L., O’Connor, L., & Glassman, J. (2014). Community college men and women: A test of three widely held beliefs about who pursues computer science. Community College Review, 42(4), 342-362.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
Grunert, M., & Bodner, G. (2011). Underneath it all: Gender role identification and women chemists’ career choices. Science Education International, 22(4), 292-301.
Topic Area: Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)
Study Type: Descriptive Analysis
