Title,Citation,Topic_area,Study_type,Study_evidence_rating,Outcome_effectiveness,Findings,Intervention_program,Topics,Target_population,Firm_characteristics,Geographic_setting,Original_publication_date,Original_publication_link,"Review Protocol"
"Exploring women engineering faculty’s mentoring networks","Long, Z., Buzzanell, P., Kokini, K., Wilson, R., Batra, J., & Anderson, L. (2013). Exploring women engineering faculty’s mentoring networks. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Washington, DC.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	
	
		The study described how women in academic STEM positions (compared with corporate environments) constructed their own mentoring networks; it also explored the mentoring configurations female academics preferred as support for their careers.
		The authors conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with seven female engineering faculty at a single large Midwestern university, creating detailed maps of the faculty members’ mentoring networks and evaluating the nature, importance, and perceived value of each connection.
		The study found that the female faculty were generally dissatisfied with formal mentoring relationships and instead sought mentors on their own. Faculty selected these informal mentors from among those with whom they had an existing relationship, such as a friend or co-committee member. Mentees selected multiple mentors with mixed backgrounds and characteristics to serve different purposes (for example, discussing work-life balance or career advancement) and mentees typically had at least one mentor outside of the department or university to discuss more confidential matters. Findings were generally consistent with mentor relationships in a corporate setting.",,"Mentoring Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs","Female, STEM professional",,"United States",2013,http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6463/download,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"An effective model for enhancing underrepresented minority participation and success in geoscience undergraduate research","Blake, R., Liou-Mark, J., & Chukuigwe, C. (2013). An effective model for enhancing underrepresented minority participation and success in geoscience undergraduate research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 405-414.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	
	
		This study described the implementation of the National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program at New York City College of Technology. This year-long program aimed to retain undergraduates in STEM disciplines and prepare them for STEM careers, especially for underrepresented minority groups, including women.
		The authors, as directors of the REU program, described each of its components, including research, minicourses, seminars and workshops, mentoring, support and networking opportunities, and presenting at and attending conferences. Outcomes were discussed in terms of post-program experiences and achievements, as well as quotes from program participants.
		Overall, the authors concluded that the program was successful in terms of demonstrated interest in, attendance in, or completion of a STEM graduate program; achievement in STEM publications; and attainment of STEM awards. These outcomes were complemented by five quotes from student participants who discussed how the program changed their academic lives.",,"Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs","Youth, Other barriers, Female",,"United States",2013,,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Women in community colleges: Access to success","St. Rose, A., & Hill, C. (2013). Women in community colleges: Access to success. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	The authors described two programs partnering with California community colleges—the Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement Community College Program (MCCP) and the CalWomen Tech Program—that aim to encourage women to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The two initiatives approach this goal in different ways: MCCP prepares women to transfer from two- to four-year STEM degree programs, whereas CalWomen Tech encourages participation in non-traditional career and technical education programs in STEM, such as information technology and automotive repair.
	MCCP offers a wide array of academic, career, and social support services, from academic tutoring and advising to a cohort-based course progression. CalWomen Tech’s promotional materials target women, such as “women in technology” websites that highlight the employment and salary opportunities available to women who choose non-traditional career paths, and skill-building or “bridge” courses that lay the groundwork for more advanced study.
	In 2010, 38 percent of MCCP transfer students from two- to four-year degree programs were women. Of those transferring to programs in life sciences or mathematics, more than 50 percent were women.
	After partnering with CalWomen Tech, female enrollment in City College of San Francisco’s computer networking and information technology program increased from 19 percent in 2006 to 33 percent in 2008, with persistent enrollment rates through 2010. Similarly, CalWomen Tech helped Evergreen Valley College raise female retention in its automotive technology program from 58 percent to 88 percent over the course of two years.",,"Youth programs Community college education and other classroom training Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs","Youth, Female",,"United States",2013,http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/05/women-in-community-colleges.pdf,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives","Brawner, C., & Camacho, M. (2012). Women in industrial engineering: Stereotypes, persistence, and perspectives. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 288-318.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	This study explored why more women major in industrial engineering in college than other engineering fields.
	The authors tabulated quantitative data from eight colleges and universities in the southeastern region of the United States using data from the Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD). They also conducted focus groups with 20 female industrial engineering students and qualitatively analyzed the content of industrial engineering department websites at the eight MIDFIELD institutions.
	The study found that students transferred into an industrial engineering major program after taking several semesters of coursework in another field at the university. It found no evidence that women with weak academic records were more likely to choose industrial engineering over other engineering majors.
	Focus group participants felt that their department had a warm, familial atmosphere, and that the major provided a more general background in engineering, which could offer them more flexible job opportunities in a variety of related fields. This was consistent with departmental websites, which marketed themselves as having a strong sense of community and collegiality, and stressed the wide range of career opportunities available to their graduates as problem solvers for society and industry.",,"Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs","Youth, Female",,"United States",2012,,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs","Pohlhaus, J.R., Jiang, H., Wagner, R.M., Schaffer, W.T., & Pinn, V.W. (2011). Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programs. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 759-767.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	The study's objective was to analyze gender differences in the award of National Institutes of Health (NIH) extramural grants in the 2008 fiscal year. This research was intended to inform efforts to improve diversity in award funding.
	Using data from the NIH Information for Management, Planning, Analysis, and Coordination electronic Research Administration database, the authors conducted cross-sectional analyses of funding rates (the percentage of applicants who received funding) and success rates (the percentage of reviewed grant applications that received funding), by career stage (early, mid, and senior) and by gender. The authors also conducted analyses specific to the prestigious R01 award—the only award not intended for a specific career stage—including a longitudinal analysis of researchers transitioning to R01 awards or applying for renewal of R01 awards.
	Overall, women tended to be as likely as men to receive NIH research and training awards in 2008, and applied for and received similar award amounts. In the R01 program, women had a similar success rate as men but a lower funding rate, which seemed to be caused by a lower rate of award among experienced applicants submitting proposals for award renewal. The longitudinal analysis confirmed that women were less likely than men to apply and receive funding for new or renewal R01 awards. Finally, fewer older women applied for and received funding, and recipients of multiple awards were more likely to be men. The authors suggest that these findings are consistent with national data showing fewer older women work in the field and are employed in senior positions.",,"Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs Other disparities or discrimination in employment and earnings","STEM professional",,"United States",2011,,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Are the predictors of women’s persistence in STEM painting the full picture? A series of comparative case studies","Hughes, R. (2011). Are the predictors of women’s persistence in STEM painting the full picture? A series of comparative case studies. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(3), 548-570.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	
	
		The study's objective was to examine the experiences of several female science and engineering majors within the literature context on predictive factors of persistence in STEM majors and careers. The study focused on the roles of parental support and education level, academic preparation, and perceptions of the STEM culture in influencing the career trajectories of female undergraduates at a United States university in 2009–2010.
		The author conducted two interviews each with five women in their fourth year of college who had chosen to major in a STEM field. The first interview collected the participant’s life history, with a focus on factors and moments leading to the decision to pursue a STEM major. The second interview, conducted several months later, recorded whether the participant’s career plans had changed.
		The study found that the participants’ experiences did not always align with what the literature predicted, and that complex factors contributed to a woman’s decision to stay in or leave a STEM major. Although all the women who stayed in a STEM field described the use of coping strategies for persisting in a male-dominated field, these strategies differed among participants. Those who chose to leave their STEM major did not necessarily do so because of a lack of academic preparation, parental support, or competence, but rather seemed to share a feeling that they did not identify with the peers in their STEM field, who they described as “uptight,” “nerdy,” and lacking a life outside of the classroom.",,"Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs","Youth, Female",,"United States",2011,,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics","Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172-208.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	The study examined existing empirical research on the challenges that minority women have faced in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines at the undergraduate and graduate levels, emphasizing factors that promote or discourage retention and transition to employment or further study.
	The authors analyzed 116 empirical studies conducted from 1970 to 2008 that examine aspects of the academic and career experiences of minority women in STEM disciplines, identifying the findings of each study and synthesizing these features to pinpoint trends and opportunities for further investigation.
	The authors summarized the studies’ conclusions regarding the effects of academic climate, enrichment programs, self-confidence, and relationships with faculty, peers, and family on minority women’s persistence in undergraduate STEM majors, highlighting lack of recognition from peers and faculty members and complex family expectations and dynamics as factors that hinder them from completing STEM degrees.
	At the graduate level, many of the same influences, particularly family expectations and fraught relationships with peers and professors, present challenges for minority women in STEM disciplines. Academic and social transitions from minority-serving institutions to predominantly white institutions and the financial demands of graduate study also represent cross-cutting obstacles.",,"Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs","Youth, Other barriers, Female",,"United States",2011,,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career","Amelink, C., & Creamer, E. (2010). Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 81-92.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	
	
		The authors investigated aspects of the undergraduate college environment associated with satisfaction with engineering as a major and students’ intent to pursue a career in engineering in the next 10 years, emphasizing gender differences.
		The authors designed a comprehensive survey comprising sections on demographic information, factors affecting career choice, self-reported scientific ability, classroom experience, academic community, curricular and extracurricular engagement, and family and academic background. Participating institutions administered the survey to undergraduate engineering majors. After collecting the data, the authors examined correlations between a set of student, faculty, and general factors and satisfaction with the decision to major in engineering or intent to work as an engineer in 10 years.
		Although male and female students were equally likely to express satisfaction with their decision to major in engineering, significantly and substantially fewer female students expected to work in an engineering career in 10 years than male students.
		Similar factors were associated with male and female students’ intent to pursue a career in engineering. Perceptions of faculty engagement with students struck a notable contrast; higher levels of agreement with the statement “in general, engineering professors care about student learning” were significantly and positively correlated with female students’ interest in long-term engineering careers, but the correlation with male students’ career intent was not significant.",,"Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs",Youth,,"United States",2010,,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics","Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, D.C.: American Association of University Women.","Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM)","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	
	
		This publication summarized the obstacles facing girls and women who wish to pursue academic or professional careers in STEM fields and highlighted solutions to these challenges at the secondary, postsecondary, and professional levels.
		The authors presented scholars’ investigations into issues surrounding gender differences in interest, retention, or careers in STEM, drawing on both interviews with the profiled scholars and their published studies.
		The paper concluded that bias and stereotypes, whether implicit or explicit, hindered girls’ development in STEM. According to the paper, promoting the idea that intelligence is not fixed and innate but can expand through hard work, dubbed the growth mindset, combats the notion that boys are inherently better at math and science than girls and encourages girls to persevere.
		Further, women in academic and industry STEM positions continued to suffer from bias and stereotypes, which can manifest themselves through unsupportive atmospheres or distorted perceptions of female employees’ competence. Clear standards for advancement can counteract some of these tendencies.",,"Youth programs Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs Other disparities or discrimination in employment and earnings","Youth, Female",,"United States",2010,http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engine…,"Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Math (STEM) Review Protocol"
"Youth work and learn at Our Piece of the Pie (OPP): Findings of the formative evaluation of Connecticut's youth development model","Britner, P., Buch, R., Colon, R., Milan, S., Singer, M., & Snow, S. (2009). Youth work and learn at Our Piece of the Pie (OPP): Findings of the formative evaluation of Connecticut's youth development model. Storrs, CT: Center for Health, Intervention and Prevention, University of Connecticut.","Opportunities for Youth","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	This report describes the work of Our Piece of the Pie (OPP), an organization that gives young people in Hartford, CT, access to a range of services, including academic assistance, vocational training, and guidance from caring adults trained to provide mentorship and other support.
	The study aimed to gather information on the characteristics of the youth served by OPP, their participation in program activities, and the progress they made in reaching academic and employment goals.
	The evaluation team conducted direct observations of intervention activities, interviews with program staff and participants, and surveys of participating youth. It also drew on program data collected by OPP.
	The study found that most participants spent a considerable amount of time with their mentors each week, with some also taking advantage of career advancement and educational preparation services. Although participating youth were making progress on their goals at the time of the evaluation, particularly in achieving educational milestones, the authors suggested that the program could benefit by strengthening participant-mentor relationships, adapting programming for special populations, and improving the quality of program data.","Our Piece of the Pie (OPP)","Job search assistance and supportive services Youth programs Mentoring Other training and education Work based and other occupational training","Youth, Disconnected youth",,"United States",2009,,"Opportunities for Youth Review Protocol"
"Bring them back, move them forward: Case studies of programs preparing out-of-school youths for further education and careers.","Buschmann, R., & Haimson, J. (2008). Bring them back, move them forward: Case studies of programs preparing out-of-school youths for further education and careers. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.","Opportunities for Youth","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	This study examined the work of six dropout recovery programs to explore how similar programs might more effectively prepare youth for postsecondary education and employment. It focused on the key services the programs provided to school dropouts, challenges related to implementing program activities, and strategies to address and resolve these challenges.
	The researchers conducted one- to two-day visits to each program site, during which they interviewed principals or program directors, instructors, counselors, records administrators, and participating students. They also gathered individual participants’ record data and aggregate reports of key outcomes.
	The study found that incoming participants’ academic ability varied greatly and that large class sizes sometimes limited the extent to which teachers could adapt their lessons to meet diverse needs. Program staff tried to develop relationships with participants and help them resolve personal problems, but found it difficult to address the most serious problems. Some participants had positive short-term outcomes such as enrolling in education or finding a job.
	The authors suggested that similar programs might want to consider collecting more cost data for planning purposes, track participants’ progress on educational and employment goals after program completion, and conduct rigorous impact studies to understand how individual program features influence their participants’ outcomes.","Dropout Programs","Job search assistance and supportive services Youth programs Community college education and other classroom training Other training and education",Youth,,"United States",2008,http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/bringback_moveforward.pdf,"Opportunities for Youth Review Protocol"
"Life after YouthBuild: 900 YouthBuild graduates reflect on their lives, dreams, and experiences","Hahn, A., Leavitt, T., Horvat, E., & Davis, J. (2004). Life after YouthBuild: 900 YouthBuild graduates reflect on their lives, dreams, and experiences. Somerville, MA: Brandeis University Heller School for Social Policy and Management and Temple University College of Education.","Opportunities for Youth","Study Type: Descriptive Analysis",,,"Summary:

	This report summarizes YouthBuild participants’ experiences after program completion. YouthBuild was founded in 1991 and offers academic instruction and construction training to economically disadvantaged youth who use those skills to build affordable housing for low-income households.
	The authors collected information on what students go on to do after YouthBuild by conducting in-depth interviews with 57 graduates and a detailed survey of 882 graduates.
	YouthBuild graduates who were interviewed had a very positive view of the program; they appreciated that staff set high expectations for them while acting as their substitute families and providing a caring environment. They also enjoyed the construction work, which enabled them to see tangible results of their efforts. Many expressed the need for additional career- or education-related programming after the period of full-time participation in YouthBuild.
	Seventy-five percent of the graduates who were surveyed were either working or engaged in postsecondary studies at the time of the survey, and similar percentages were free of government support and participating in at least one community activity. Like the interview findings, many survey respondents expressed a need for further career- or education-related programming.",Youthbuild,"Youth programs Other training and education Work based and other occupational training","Youth, Low income",Construction,"United States",2004,,"Opportunities for Youth Review Protocol"